Here you can add additional parameters to instruct the list command to filter by certain criteria. For possible options, see the Bitwarden documentation: https://help.bitwarden.com/article/cli/#list
If you have something that can be shared with other users, please feel free to send a PR on Github!
that’s right, the script supports 2FA. The popup is not spawned by Royal TS/X though but by the TkInter, which is a dependency for the script as mentioned in the “Notes” section.
Do you have that dependency installed?
The best way to debug dynamic folder issues is to save the script to a standalone file and try running it from a terminal session. That way you should be able to find out what’s wrong. Don’t forget to replace the tokens ($) with actual values before trying to run it.
Sorry for the gravediggin, I’m just trying to see what the options are.
If this still is the state of the art, then I’m sorry but I’ll be direct. This is not good.
There are not so many “ubiquitous” credential managers, and bitwarden is one of them. It’s open source and easy to integrate.
RoyalTS is made to, or at least aims to, make life easier for large, multisite enterprise IT departments to use a single source of truth for server management. You can’t ask a 60 people IT department ranging from 1ist to 3rd level to go through setting all of this up, and still pay 3000+€/year.
You don’t need to support dozens of credential managers, you need to support the most ubiquitous ones. I can bet Bitwarden is the most used amongst RoyalTS users.
Please provide direct integration. It can’t be that hard to do.
The dynamic folder integration has several advantages compared to a direct implementation:
It can be used as a template and customized to your needs
It can be updated/released independent from the product
It can be read/analyzed to ensure nothing “bad” happens with the data as the code is available and everything is transparent
Especially point 1 is important because all these various products don’t have feature parity with our products and everyone has different needs. So the ability to customize the integration is an important one. We had (still have) direct implementations and the reality is that everyone has different requirements and needs.
That being said, can you tell us what is wrong or what doesn’t work with the dynamic folder integration? You can open a github issue, create a new question here or open a support ticket.